Polismyndighetens bibliotek och kunskapstjänst
 
The Impact of Evidence Type on Police Investigators' Perceptions of Suspect Culpability and Evidence Reliability
Komihåglistan är tom
Vis
Författare/Namn
Titel
  • The Impact of Evidence Type on Police Investigators' Perceptions of Suspect Culpability and Evidence Reliability
Förlag, etc.
  • Hogrefe Publishing Group, 2020
Utgivningsår
  • 2020
Anmärkning: Allmän
  • Kontakta biblioteket ifall du inte får tillgång till fulltext.
Anmärkning: Innehållsbeskrivning, sammanfattning
  • In a repeated-measures experimental study, we examined how evidence type influences police investigators' beliefs about (a) suspect's culpability and (b) reliability of incriminating evidence. South Korean detectives (N = 202) read four crime reports including general information about a crime and a suspect. In the general case information, one piece of critical and several pieces of noncritical evidence collected during the investigation were presented. Officers read four simulated reports of crimes, and in each report, they were given one piece of evidence linking the suspect to the crime. We manipulated the critical evidence identifying the suspect with four evidence types: CCTV, DNA, fingerprint, and eyewitness testimony. We found that evidence type influenced detectives' judgments about suspect's culpability and evidence reliability, such that when eyewitness (vs. CCTV, DNA, fingerprint) evidence was given as critical evidence, officers were more likely to think that the suspect was less culpable and that the evidence was less reliable. Theoretical and legal implications of these results are discussed.
Ämnesord
Ämnesord
Medarbetare
Institution
  • Göteborgs universitet. Psykologiska institutionen
Värdpublikation
  • Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie. ISSN 2151-2604 ; 228:3, s. 188-198
Antal i kö:
  • 0 (0)
 
*00002903naa a2200325   4500
*00135323
*008240528s2020    |  |||||||||||000 ||eng| 
*0247 $ahttps://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/295296$2URI
*0247 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000411$2DOI
*035  $a(SwePub)oai:gup.ub.gu.se/295296
*041  $aeng
*1001 $aJang, Minhwan$0(Swepub:gu)xjanmi
*24510$aThe Impact of Evidence Type on Police Investigators' Perceptions of Suspect Culpability and Evidence Reliability
*264 1$bHogrefe Publishing Group,$c2020
*500  $aKontakta biblioteket ifall du inte får tillgång till fulltext.
*520  $aIn a repeated-measures experimental study, we examined how evidence type influences police investigators' beliefs about (a) suspect's culpability and (b) reliability of incriminating evidence. South Korean detectives (N = 202) read four crime reports including general information about a crime and a suspect. In the general case information, one piece of critical and several pieces of noncritical evidence collected during the investigation were presented. Officers read four simulated reports of crimes, and in each report, they were given one piece of evidence linking the suspect to the crime. We manipulated the critical evidence identifying the suspect with four evidence types: CCTV, DNA, fingerprint, and eyewitness testimony. We found that evidence type influenced detectives' judgments about suspect's culpability and evidence reliability, such that when eyewitness (vs. CCTV, DNA, fingerprint) evidence was given as critical evidence, officers were more likely to think that the suspect was less culpable and that the evidence was less reliable. Theoretical and legal implications of these results are discussed.
*650  $aFörhör
*650  $aIntervjuteknik
*650  $aBevis (juridik)
*650  $aPolisarbete
*650  $aBevisbörda
*650  $aBeslutsfattande$xpsykologiska aspekter
*653  $aPolForsKart
*653  $aForensik
*7001 $aLuke, Timothy,$d1989$uGothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Psykologiska institutionen,Department of Psychology$4aut$0(Swepub:gu)xlukti
*7001 $aGranhag, Pär-Anders,$d1964$uGothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Psykologiska institutionen,Department of Psychology$4aut$0(Swepub:gu)xgrapa
*7001 $aVrij, A.$4aut
*7102 $aGöteborgs universitet.$bPsykologiska institutionen
*7730 $tZeitschrift Fur Psychologie.$x2151-2604 ;$g228:3, s. 188-198
*85648$uhttps://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000411$yFulltext
*85648$uhttps://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/295296$yArtikeln på GU:s webbplats
^
Det finns inga omdömen till denna titeln.
Klicka här för att vara den första som skriver ett omdöme.
Vis
Sänd till